<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Spiritual on Terminal Monk</title>
		<link>http://localhost:1313/categories/spiritual/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Spiritual on Terminal Monk</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-in</language>
		
		
		
			<copyright>© 2026 Terminal Monk. All rights reserved.</copyright>
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="http://localhost:1313/categories/spiritual/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>What the panchang taught me about paying attention</title>
				<link>http://localhost:1313/posts/what-the-panchang-taught-me/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>http://localhost:1313/posts/what-the-panchang-taught-me/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Most of the software I&amp;rsquo;ve spent my career on treats time as a flat, interchangeable resource — a timestamp, a cron schedule, a TTL. Every second is like every other second. That&amp;rsquo;s a useful fiction for a scanner running at 2am. It&amp;rsquo;s a strange way to actually live.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The panchang doesn&amp;rsquo;t work like that. Every day carries a tithi, a nakshatra, a specific quality — some hours are better for starting things, some for finishing, some for staying quiet. None of it is measurable in the way I&amp;rsquo;m trained to measure things. I can&amp;rsquo;t write a test for it. But I&amp;rsquo;ve noticed that the practice of checking — actually pausing to ask &amp;ldquo;what kind of day is this&amp;rdquo; — changes how I move through the day, independent of whether the categories themselves are &amp;ldquo;real&amp;rdquo; in whatever sense a stack trace is real.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
